http://medokh.org/wp-content/uploads/John-of-God-LaesEr1-300x214.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 729px) 100vw, 729px" />
Thank you Lara for inviting me to your next conference in France
and I think it would be very interesting to have a speaker about “Alan Kardec”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Kardec as he was French and John of God considers him a good proponent of Spiritism.
We had amazing time with John of God in the last few days as also Ekkehart the engineer from Germany (left) was with us
much is coming – because of this connection
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:56 AM, lara-mathilda Lellouche <email@example.com> wrote:
I know Alan Kardec? Nevertheless, my congress http://www.youtube.com/watch?
is Absolutely not about Spiritualism or Metaphysic.
It is about Scientific Innovation and efficiency as the CoRe.
We must be careful as we are receiving governments support and the R20. That is why Nasim’s work is interesting too. He makes all the links in a scientific way.
Nevertheless, I can learn from his experience.
our world today can see that our science is not giving the answers to our real questions – which are emotional and spiritual –
and therefor people like Nassim and Gregg Braden get such a great audience – simply because they use the concepts of contemporary physics and mix them together and make them mystical and entertaining and most of all make fun about all the old conventional scientists who “still do not get the point” who “are still caught in old interpretations of physics” then they create lectures like this one from Nassim
where he talks for ten minutes about the fact that his primary school teacher could not make sense of his early childhood esoteric experiences but that he then at age 7 during a bus ride came to the answer – “that the world is not made of non-exising points” but of real-volume DOTs – and this explains everything. (yet another theory of all and everything)
He tells the world in an “entertaining way” that at age 7 he already figured out what his teacher was not able to grasp – this is the vanity ego-trip of most pseudo-science presenters today – and they always have an audience that has somewhat less physics understanding then them and thus have an easy way to find admirers.
I call pseudo-science all that is not able to produce useful results – technologies that can be used or emotional or health changes that are reproducible. This means to me not only most New-age talk is pseudo-science but also the work of most lectures at established universities who possibly know how to write quantum equations – as they are laid out in books but are not able to derive something useful from it. But the work of John of God is “real science” as it produces reproducible results in thousands of people. Also I consider the CoRe system that creates reproducible placebo effects in the health of people “real science”.
The most important thing as a speaker of this kind is to observe that their audience has the total conviction that “we as a culture have made a great step from the age of “doctrine, religion, church” to our present state of “individualism, personal freedom, technology and science” and certainly that we do not need to – or should go back to – the misleading pseudo-science of spiritism, astrology and all the other META-physics.
All of these talkers like Nassim, Gregg and there are countless have one thing in common – they have nothing practical to show. They try like Hartmut Mueller to convince the world, that their theories (e.g. vacuum space-wave) are a real explanation that dissolves the countless contradictions of previous theories . However mostly believing themselves the reality and greatness of their own theories and not intentionally trying to fool their audience with fake communication experiments for example.
Nassim for example as all others is building his theories on some simple assumptions that “look reasonable” but that are not tested or questioned by his audience and thus do not lead to a conflict in the minds of people.
In this video for example he says “Of course – all that exists contains volume”.
Another more conventional talker – will say “Of course – all that exists has frequency” .
But then ask both of them “show me the frequency or the volume of Love, religion, sainthood, reliability, happiness, dedication, hate, poverty, good taste, leadership, conflict” a.s.o.
They are all as far away from the experience of reality as Einstein who called time and space independent phenomena “spooky interaction at a distance”.
And they are away from reality as they all have a pet-theory that gives them a feeling of conclusiveness that takes the contradiction out of lives experience – that finally after all philosophers before them they have found a way to “think it out” – no more need to sweat and denial, of suffering and acceptance of contradiction and uncertainty – finally they found the key the GOD-helmet that allows you to see it all – no need for spooky spiritism or the help of saints that hundreds of years did still work hard and uphold a corrupt religious hierarchy without a clue how much they were misled and abused.
Kiran offers another approach – I know that the future belongs to those who can bring spiritism, emotion, prayer, ritual, language, art, music, ……that I all consider just as forms of informational communication – together with technology and physiological techniques for a DLE experience that does not need to exclude.
Exclusion is really a big part of New Age philosophy although they all do lip-service to their openness to all and everything. Lara you also ended with the standard New Age motto “Nevertheless, I can learn from his experience.“ – but for sure you will not invite a presenter about spiritism to your conference – that is what I call “lip-service”.
John of God is an evolved Soul and therefore he can be truly open and resonating to all beings. We came this week to donate the Bioresoance-LaesEr to be used in his clinic. And if he were like others – he would have seen technology as a competition to spiritism – but NO – he said “It is a good device and please instruct my people how to use it”.
Comment by Wallace Lima to Lara and myself :
Dear Wallace and Lara