14 thoughts on “Eigen-Resonance & Know-Thyself – Introduction

  1. Dear Kiran,
    First be advised that I always read your posts or watch your videos with great interest and follow and deeply appreciate your work. Knowing that we still have a heart and a mind living together in the human being is very reassuring.
    I’m not afraid to make a fool of myself by responding to your post, between your lines.
    You can see below a very complete list (Saying this list is very complete, does that mean exhaustive, everything is there?) of what eminent men have said about the need to 
    “Know your SELF”
    but it is astonishing superficial and clueless (That’s maybe because knowledge of the Self can’t be grasped by the intellect and can’t be experimented without prior preparations, guidance and tunings? The world is not short of school of Mysteries, they always have existed as you know, and when the cosmic clock rings, probabilities prove that the door may open for some! Mysteries used to be mysteries perhaps because not everyone is in the opinion to have the earth populated by humans with a Sense of Self with a high level of Eigen Resonance as they do very bad slaves.


  2. Hi Everyone,
    Know Thy Self may be seen as part of a psychodynamic which asks a question: Who am I? Historically, this question in the literature has been associated with the Philosophia Perennis. Understanding Who am I? requires a mastery of ordinary consciousness, meaning knowing and experiencing the relationship of ordinary perception to this question of self. In order to observe and experience I there needs to be a non-I also observing. So really, non-I elements exist yet most of the time go unobserved because of ordinary functioning. Non-ordinary consciousness is a Reality for those functions which can participate in it, and this seems to me to be the crux of this issue of knowing. Knowing changes when  the state of consciousness of the observer changes.

    • Hello Daniel

      I think this is the mistake of all of western thought to imagine and even propose that “in order to observe yourself there needs to be something that is not yourself “. I is a nice psychological trick to think that all the nonsense that you observe in your actions, thoughts and emotions is not YOU YOURSELF – and with this sweet lie you can continue exactly this nonsense. Once you accept that you are exactly what you observe both in yourself and in God – and not by thinking yourself into the objective observer-role you have and become compassionate and feel a little of what God feels


      Having pried through the strata, analyzed to a hair,
      counsel’d with doctors and calculated close,
      I find no sweeter fat than sticks to my own bones.
      I exist as I am, that is enough,
      If no other in the world be aware I sit content,
      And if each and all be aware I sit content.
      Excerpts from “Song of Myself” by Walt Whitman

      • Hi Kiran’
        I think you are completely correct. What I observe is me, Dan. Yet what does this looking is not me. Awareness of ego=self=Self exists within and without observation. I am That I am. This is how I see this.
        I just got back to the Island yesterday from my travels South and I will look at the new system seeing what my needs are.
        Be well,

        • Dear Dan

          What Exits, what was first, if it exists even without anyone watching…. are all questions of the mind –

          and my point is that in our culture we have too much of this already – not that it is bad in itself.

          The mind also has two parts the analytic and the synthetic part – the problem is only that again in our culture

          the analytic, the left part is overused, and most therapists use the CoRe software also mostly from a left brain

          point – but fortunately we have now the Bio-LaesEr which bypasses the brain and creates a Sense-of-Self, of being

          without much possibility of error on the side of the therapist or the client

          “To be or not to be this is the question” and not “Who is it who is watching”


          • Hi Kiran,
            I like what I read and hear you say about your Bio-LasER system. Helping any person experience their true nature is a gift.
            Bw well,

            …. and particularly because the mind is not involved – that is why we suck on our thumb when we are small and try to get the same experience when we suck on a cigarette or a breast when we are older Kiran

  3. Kiran:
    I always enjoy reading your comment and watching your instructional videos.
    For me part of, knowing thy self, is contained in two questions that all humans must answer before they die:
    Why am I here?
    What do I want?
    They must be answered in that order.

    Kiran’s comment :

    Yes we know that but let us know how you attempt to answer these questions

  4. For me, as a Catholic, the old Baltimore Catechism answers this question: ” “God made us to know Him, to love Him and to serve Him in this world, and to be happy with Him for ever in Heaven”. Very simply, God made us to for relationship with Him. I need to remember this and think of it through out my life by practicing my Faith.
    The answer to the second one is easy keeping the first one in mind. By staying close to Him and allowing Him to lead me, my choice of career and how I interact with others is paramount to knowing, loving and serving. The study of the Enneagram I’ve found to be most useful, in determining who I am and what needs to be done on an on-going basis to raise myself to a higher level of both Communion and communion with Him and the world.

    Kiran :

    Yes agreed – but many people today have a difficulty to feel the presence and guidance of God – for me because they do not have enough Sense of Self to act as an antenna – this is why we see such great changes with the http://www.bioresonance-LaesEr.com

  5. Hi Everyone,
    “To know God is to know Self” (Ramana Maharishi, 2000). As a thinking, feeling,sensing, and moving being, knowing Absolute dimensions, or knowing God, to me means knowing intellectually, emotionally, instinctively, and spatially what I am.
    Yet, knowing can be one dimensional if it is not accompanied by being, meaning the ability to be, to exist. So my efforts at knowing God can be seen as being who I am an knowing this, living this. God is. Can i say the same about Dan?
    Be well,

    Kiran’s reply :

    Hello Dan – the problem is that everyone thinks he “knows, feels and senses” himself – but this is an illusion – as it needs a mirror for all this to actually happen – allowing and welcoming these mirrors that we will experience always as threatening or at least uncomfortable is the task at hand. To “knows, feels and senses” oneself is what we all will do when we are worn out enough by our drive to avoid the mirror-events, but it is a very slow process, of many lifetimes. When you however understand that polarity creates this mirror effect than you can not only allow it when it happens but even create methods that contain this mirror-element. My 5 forms of DLE are about this – the first one which I discussed here deals with creating these polarities in the realm of the intellect.

    For example it is one thing to “know that you do not have money” but is is a different degree of realization when you actually experience that you cannot buy what others can or if someone even tells you that “You are a poor guy” – that is what I call a mirror-effect that creates DLE

    • Hi Kiran,
      Yes, as Nisgardatta so eloquently pointed out: Affectionate awareness is the crucial factor that brings Reality into focus (Nisgardatta, 1996, p. 122). By this I understand him to means that the observer and the person being observed need to recognize each other:.. . It is only when the observer (vyakta) accepts the person (vyakti) as a projection or manifestation of himself and, so to say, takes the self into the Self, the duality of I and this goes, and in the identity of the outer and the inner the Supreme Reality (Spirit) manifests itself. This union of the seer and the seen happens when the seer becomes conscious of himself as the seer; he is not merely interested in the seen, which he is anyhow, but also interested in being interested, giving attention to attention, aware of being aware. 
      For me, and some of my clients, this affectionate awareness begins at the moment of Presence brought to the forefront through dividing attention. Like breath in meditation, attention is the breath of awareness. Bringing the MindBody complex into continual focus creates the mirror of Presence.
      What do you think?
      Be well,

      Kiran’s comment:

      “Take the self into the Self” and all these words feel good to the mind but when someone tells you “You are an average person” and deep down you know it – this hurts and it is just to know that hurt and pain is the way to God and if we know that there are only “painful” shortcuts to “take the Self” to take your Cross as Jesus said – this is the simple and certainly for ever unpopular truth – philosophy will alway be more popular

  6. Hi Kiran,
    I have been studying your DLE and feel it is quite similar to the concept I am developing called the Mind/Body Index (MBI) which is basically a value which reflects a persons relationship to their Essence, and Personality. I prefer to use the word Ego for Personality since I fell that it is less encumbered word than personality.
    I think your DLE is a brilliant, practical tool which I am looking forward to exploring as soon as my Core system is up and running. I am waiting for some more RAM to upgrade the storage capacity in my laptop so I can handle the v6 system.
    Best wishes to you and Deborah for a Happy Christmas and an Abundant New Year.
    Be well,

    • Dear Dan

      I would be careful to equate different ideas – it always leads to a mistaken comfort of “knowing” that cancels curiosity and further impulses to investigate deeper.

      DLE has nothing to do with a way to quantify any psychological qualities – however I think this is a very useful and profitable goal.

      DLE is a way of life that knows that all aging and decrease of health is the result of locking-in on a defined place between the polarities that are always challenging a choice – in short DLE means the degree of “openness to Change”

      enjoy the new possibilities that CoRe will give to your work
      and be prepared for some very unexpected results


  7. Hi Everyone,
    After using the BBR System on myself and several of my clients I can see that I exist in a polarized being. What is now becoming important is a bridge between these two poles. Pathagoras envisioned a right triangle with the horizontal base representing human nature, the vertical axis representing Spirit, and the hypotenuse representing Soul, or Essence.
    The BBR System connects to the bridge in our existence.
    Be well,

    • Hello Dan

      I think this is an observation that matches mine. The more you make Bioresonance LaesEr treatment you see more and more polarities inside of yourself or your clients

      not because it is getting worse but because you are starting to heal and to reduce the mountains of difference. Initially you cannot see the forest because of all the trees.

      This landscape is what I call the Ego and the purpose of existence and of the Bioresonance LaesEr therapy is to aim to establish an Even Ego – coincidently I just wrote about this here :


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *